Monday, November 29, 2010
Most school districts expecting deficits in 2012
Friday, October 1, 2010
New site lays it down straight.
Kudos to those working hard to put our kids and our community first.
Speaking as someone who personally has been adversely affected by the economic downturn in a serious way, I am still voting yes, because it's that important.
The reasons to vote no are wearing very thin. The time for Springboro to UNITE is now. Vote YES! Hell Yes!
Editorial : Levy Offers Springboro A Frash Start
Springboro’s school district has new leaders and is seeking a fresh start. A 6.83-mill emergency levy would put the district on solid financial footing as a new superintendent and treasurer join a mostly new school board in charting a different path.
Voters should give the new crew that opportunity.
Whoever was at fault, a breakdown in trust between the district and the community was a big reason for four consecutive levy defeats in Springboro. The most recent came in May of 2009. Too many voters lost faith in the board and former Superintendent David Baker.
Critics of the district’s spending focused on administrative costs they argued needed scaling back. They bristled when district leaders, in their view, prioritized cuts like bus service and closing an elementary school.
Interim Superintendent Gene Lolli (a finalist for the permanent post) and new Treasurer Eric Beavers have put fresh eyes on Springboro’s problems. Their verdict is instructive.
Overall, they report not finding anything in the district’s budget that was extraordinarily out of line. They believe teacher and administrator salaries, for example, are solidly competitive with similar districts and reasonable. The total cost reductions over the past 18 months have amounted to $6.5 million. Administrators took the brunt of the most recent round of cuts.
The central office, long cited by the district’s critics as bloated, was cut by about 30 percent, down 10 positions to 24. At the same time, the district used federal stimulus funds to restore busing service reductions that had rankled some parents.
All the while, Springboro has maintained solid performance on state tests. The district is rated “excellent” on its state report card. Its “performance index score,” Ohio’s measure of test performance across all grades, ranks in the top 10 among 79 districts in the 10 counties surrounding Dayton.
Of course, a lot of competing districts have also made cuts. Springboro can’t keep cutting forever and maintain a quality program.
Even after all the recent reductions, Mr. Beavers projects a deficit of $1.7 million by 2012. Springboro is a relatively well-off district (No. 1 in the area for median income, higher than Oakwood), and it is treated as such by the state funding formula. The district can’t expect any help from the state.
Meanwhile, enrollment continues to grow (although not quite at the intense pace of recent years). That requires more teachers, pushing costs higher. If Springboro wants to maintain top-quality schools, the burden will fall on the local taxpayer.
Today that burden is not terribly heavy. Property taxes for schools in Springboro are actually lower than other suburban districts like Centerville, Oakwood, Kettering, Huber Heights and West Carrollton.
Supporting a 6.83-mill levy won’t be easy for some Springboro residents. The recession has hit just about everywhere. But the district has done everything it can to earn voter support — changing leadership, cutting spending and maintaining excellent results.
A “yes” vote would get the district on solid financial footing.
Springboro Narrows Superintendent Search Down to Four
Sunday, September 26, 2010
Superintentions
3:04 PM Thursday, September 23, 2010
SPRINGBORO — Today the Springboro school board is expected to begin interviewing the eight finalists for the school superintendent’s job.
The board is expected to interview seven Ohio school administrators, as well as interim Superintendent Gene Lolli, who was appointed to head the district after the resignation of David Baker, effective July 1.
Since then, the board has replaced a member and hired a new treasurer, but has yet to decide on the administrator to head the district.
“We need to get somebody in place permanently,” board member Scott Anderson said.
Other finalists are Joel Anderson, director of curriculum and instruction for the Warren County Joint Vocational Schools; Hank Jackoby, an assistant principal at Fairmont High School; and five superintendents from other Ohio districts, Matthew Dill, Fort Frye Local Schools; Tony Dunn, Georgetown Exempted Village Schools; Doug Fries, Lincolnview Local Schools; Darren Jenkins, Northwest Ohio Educational Service Center; and Clinton Moore, National Trail Local Schools.
Voters and board members, including Anderson, have expressed confidence in Lolli, formerly an assistant principal at Springboro High School.
But the board also plans to interview the other seven finalists selected after a search by a consultant with the Ohio School Boards Association.
First round interviews are to continue on Sept. 25 and Sept. 29.
The board plans to introduce candidates selected from the personal interviews to the public before hiring the superintendent, ideally by the end of October.
“We have to let the process unwind,” Anderson said.
It was unclear whether the new superintendent would be on board before the Nov. 2 levy election, unless Lolli is selected.
“That’s all up in the air,” Anderson said.
The board had weighed waiting until after the election, when district voters will consider a 6.83 mill emergency levy expected to raise $5.9 million a year for five years. Voters have rejected four consecutive levies for new operating money, most recently by 111 votes in May 2009.
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Reposting from DDN article - Larry Budd Fri Aug 16th
SPRINGBORO — After a two-day delay, the Springboro school board voted on Thursday, July 15, to put a five- year, 6.83-mill emergency levy on November ballots.
By a 4-1 vote, the board approved putting a levy, which would raise $5.9 million a year and cost property owners $209 for every $100,000 of valuation, on the Nov. 2 ballot.
On Tuesday, the board delayed a decision on whether to ask voters for another tax levy so members could study levy options.
After reviewing options, such as an earned-income tax, the board approved the identical emergency property tax levy on Thursday that was tabled Tuesday.
“Stop the drama. Stop the in-fighting. Do what is right for this community,” Tamara Hawes, a mom with two children in the district, said before the vote.
District voters have rejected four consecutive levies for new operating money, most recently by 111 votes in May 2009.
Board Member Don Miller said the board needs to give voters a chance to approve the proposed levy, but that cuts are expected in the next five years even if it passes.
While approving the levy, Board Member Scott Anderson said he favored a larger tax, perhaps a continuing levy, to eliminate the need for future cuts to sustain the level of services.
Warren county issues up for vote on ballot this coming fall
School issues on the ballot include:
• Franklin City Schools — 4.2-mill additional bond issue.
• Kings Local Schools — A five-year, 3-mill, renewal levy.
• Lebanon City Schools — A five-year, 5.41-mill, renewal levy.
• Little Miami Local Schools — A four-year, incremental additional tax levy starting at 10.95 mills. • Mason City Schools — An incremental continuing additional tax levy that starts at 3.95 mills the first year, 5.95-mills the second year, 6.95 the third year.
• Springboro Community City Schools — A five-year, 6.83-mill additional emergency tax levy.
The cities of Carlisle and Franklin will also have tax issues on the Nov. 2 ballot.
Carlisle will have a 2-mill, continuing replacement fire levy. Franklin will ask for a 0.5-percent increase in its city income tax which is currently at 1.5 percent.
Hamilton, Washington and Wayne township have public safety tax issues on the ballot.
• Hamilton Twp. has a five-year, 1-mill additional tax for police services.
• Washington Twp. will have two fire renewal levies on the ballot. One renewal fire levy will be for 1-mill over four years. The other renewal will be for 1.06-mills over four years.
• Wayne Twp. will have a five-year, 2.45-mill replacement fire levy.
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
THE NEW RANKINGS ARE IN!
Way to go Springboro!
Friday, May 8, 2009
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
111
Regroup? Retool? ReUNITE?
Oh, the drama. I am disappointed, but heartened at the same time.
Our community clearly cares and is passionate. On both sides we expressed our right to vote. We expressed our right to free speech. We expressed our opinions.
I don't know what is next for Springboro, but I know one thing. I love this town and I am here to stay. Whether a new ballot is in order or new ideas, I am in support of the community. Good job for getting out there and voicing your opinions.
We will be ok. My commenters have taught me a lot. The media has enlightened me as well at times. Both sides have much to be proud of. Perhaps we can find ways to meet in the middle.
Full of hope.
